Coldwar Soviet tanks and AFVs

Coldwar Soviet Tanks

1947-1990 – Soviet Union

Models

Prototypes

Situation in 1945.

In 1945, the Red army seemed unstoppable. With almost twice the numbers of soldiers and armoured vehicles than the allies, some among the top staff officers realized how easy it could have been to not stop half way but just run to the sea with such a massive and well-oiled war machine, fulfilling the promised “world proletarian revolution” prophetised by Lenin. Both sides were indeed well aware of what was seen largely as uneasy alliance, dictated by circumstances, and after the end of hostilities, peace negotiations with Stalin proved to be especially tough.

The West did not saw the political turn of events in eastern Europe in a favourable way, so much so that tensions rose almost immediately for the control of Berlin and partition of Germany according to the respective advance of the parties.

The red army fielded an impressive array of tanks, perhaps 50 000 surviving T-34s of all types and several thousands of IS-I, II, III, among others armoured vehicles that were partly sent back from Mandchuria.

At that point in early 1946, a fight would have been a long and protracted one, since on both sides soldiers and crews were well equipped quite experienced. In a “what-if” scenario, the 1944 Sherman had serious capabilities against the T-34/85, with guns and targeting sights that would have compensated for a dire numeric inferiority. On paper, the IS-III seemed superior to the M26 Pershing, but the latter had a far greater rate of fire and probably better range and reliability.

In addition most of the light tanks (T-50, T-60 & T-70s) fielded by the Red army were quite inferior to the M24 Chaffee. In addition there was still no doctrine associated with infantry carried by armoured vehicles, contrary to the US Army which actively tested fully enclosed tracked APCs.

The turn of 1947

Several events consolidated the partition of Germany and mutual defiance emerged in 1946-47 that are related to the fall of the “Iron curtain” according to the legendary “Sinews of Peace” speech of Winston Churchill on 5 March 1946, at Westminster College. At that point the tension just rose to the point of no return. The creation of the Cominform appeared to tightening up the grip on the new East European territories by Moskow, but the Tito-Stalin split proved that this control was not destined to be absolute.

Since early 1946, Washington was warned and encouraged to take a had line against USSR (George F. Kennan’s “Long Telegram”) and Truman’s advisors seemed to confirm this position afterwards, building the containment doctrine which later evolved to the 1950s “domino effect” containment theory that conducted US forces in Korea and Vietnam. The situation was rendered even worse on the soviet side, when the Molotov co-signed the Novikov telegram sent to the US embassy.

There was a mood of “capitalistic conspiracy” and mutual defiance in the east, well fed by an increasingly paranoid Stalin, which could led to a new conflict for many officers. The Morgenthau Plan -a proposition for rearming Germany- added further provocation to this already tense situation. The plan was postponed until 1954, resulting in the creation of two rival military organizations.

The Korean war (1950-53)

The first “hot” conflict to emerge in this tense environment saw Korea involved in a four-year indirect confrontation between the two superpowers and their own spheres of influence. Despite being fought in a single country, it drew nations from all over the world. It was trigerred by an invasion by North Korean forces, and the UNO response, which led a coalition of nations led by the U.S. to help defend South Korea. The North Korean forces were then largely supplied by Stalin in relatively modern tanks, trucks, artillery, and small arms. Tanks were of world war two stock, the bulk being T-34/85s.

At first, the military confrontation in the southern plains saw an ideal terrain for tanks in both camps, many US tanks being then also of ww2 stock. The first military aid given to South Korean forces were M24 Chaffee, easily matched by the T-34s.

Things changed however with massive US reinforcements and the landing at Inchon, the situation was reversed and better allied tanks were fielded, the M26 Pershing and M46 Patton, and for the first time, the British Centurion, that ruled supreme, washing over any opposition. After the conflict was displaced due north in mountainous terrain, tanks to tanks encounters became the exception. When Chinese Forces massively intervened to avoid the collapse of a friendly army, their own tanks were also soviet-supplied and mostly used for infantry support.

The Korean war served as a testing ground for soviet pilots, but there is no record of soviet tank crews being engaged in active military operations, other than a few advisors. No T-54, then a new and formidable generation of tanks ever saw action in this conflict, despite an assumed superiority over allied tanks. But reports of the rare tank to tank battles of the conflict were carefully studied by soviet military intelligence and lessons passed onto soviet tanks design in the late 1950s, as well as those learned later from the Franco-British-Israeli intervention against Egypt (then also equipped with ww2-era soviet armour) over the Suez canal.

The Warsaw pact (1955)

The German Democratic Republic, the People’s Republic of Bulgaria, of Poland, of Romania, of Hungary, of Albania and the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic constituted the foundations of the future Warsaw pact, in a later response to NATO, formed in April 1949. This further institutionalized the cold war, following the refusal of the Marshall plan and the constitution of an Eastern equivalent, the Molotov plan. The Warsaw pact really began as a military side of the Council for Mutual Economic Assistance (CoMEcon) in 1955 after West Germany was officially integrated inside NATO.

According to this military alliance, all the eastern European states would receive not only a whole array of modern weapons, but also participate with their industrial capabilities (this was especialy true for Poland and Czechoslovakia) to the building of a formidable conventional force. The Warsaw pact became synonymous to the ever growing ever-threatening shadow of tens of thousands of tanks and armoured vehicles that will drive NATO\’s experts and military policy, in the Pentagon and at the general staffs in all Western countries, and had a tremendous influence on tank design. Despite its notorious independence, Yugoslavia also imported soviet armoured vehicles and began to develop its own variants and derivatives in the 1980s.

Situation in 1960

At that time, the Red Army had completely modernized its conventional forces both in air and land, built a massive nuclear deterrent and a formidable naval force altogether. Despite the death of Stalin, there were still hard-liners in the supreme soviet council that believed war was inevitable. One of these hard-liners, Nikita Khrushchev was in power at that time. In 1960 the bulk of soviet armour was still made of large fleets of T-34/85s, reinforced by ten of thousands of T-54s, and a few thousands of the new T-55s. For the first time, soviet troops had a large array of specialized vehicles at their disposal, the BTRs (Bronetransporters) all wheeled (4×4 – the BTR-40, 6×6 – the BTR-152, and 8×8, the brand new BTR-60) at the exception of the amphibious and tracked BTR-50s. This early generation of vehicles had open troop compartments contrary to US practice. This reflected the ww2 inherited practice of quick deployment that saw infantry disembarking by jumping over the side. But since 1958, the threat of shrapnels and later NBC weaponry conducted the soviet industry to have all these vehicles covered in a proper way.

The soviet doctrine, despite the lessons learned from failed or near-failed airborne operations, like the German assault on Crete, and “Market Garden” still had a tremendous respect for the paratroopers capability, inherited from the old 1930s “deep battle” tactical doctrine. Large paratroopers units were maintained, and equipped with a variety of support vehicles, like the ASU-57 tankettes and later ASU-85 SPGs, or the 1970s BDM-1 infantry fighting vehicle. These vehicles were airdropped with several systems, some using rocket-launched platforms. All three tanks could be also airlifted and landed on any spot on the map thanks to the help of massive helicopters like the Mil MI-6 (1957). American equivalents like the M41 Walker Bulldog and the M60 Sheridan were less successful in this way.

A third component was the soviet Marines, well equipped since a true amphibious force was set-up for worldwide interventions. The quest for amphibious or water-fording capable vehicles concerned most if not all armoured vehicles in the soviet inventory that were first conceived in the late 1950s. Both the PT-76 and the BTR-50 which was based on the same chassis, shared excellent amphibious capabilities that were well-studied contrary to regular medium tanks that need a lot of preparations to ford rivers, being submerged. Floating vehicles were not a new concept for the red army.

It goes in straight line to the 1930s T-37A and T-38 tankettes inspired by a 1930 Vickers prototype, but production and development was put to a halt due to wartime priorities, and production restricted to a very few selected models. However there was no real equivalent in the red army to the American array of LVTs before the 1960s.

The middle east: Impact and lessons of the 1967 and 1973 wars.

Détente and new tanks developments (1970-80s).

The collapse (1990).

CEI’s forces, doctrine and operations.

WORK IN PROGRESS !

Heavy tanks, from the JS-3 to the T-10 (1959)

IS-3 in Czechoslovakia after the war
T-10M
The T-10/T-10M was the last of a heavy tanks breed that never proved their usefulness since the emergence of far cheaper and faster tanks like the T-54/55s and especially the T-62. (off scale)

IS-3 (1945)

IS-3 heavy tank
2311 built. Developed from 1944 but only introduced at the very end of the war this third gen. heavy tank called “Spike” and introducing the new hemispheric cast turret has a completely revised armour but the same 122mm gun as for the IS-2, and served until the 1960s.

IS-4 (1947)

IS-4 heavy tank
250 built. A less ambitious design, alternative to the IS-3. The hull was still inspired by the T-34 simple design (although with a faceted front) and the turret was modelled after the T-34/85 one. Production was stopped because of poor mobility and its short active service was spent facing China.

IS-6 and IS-7 (1945 and 1946)

The IS-6 prototype Object 253 tested an electrical transmission, but the project was dropped as it was prone to overheating. The Object 252 had the same design but with a modified drivetrain and conventional transmission. The IS-7 (3 prototypes) was developed in 1948 with a 130 mm S-70 gun and autoloader in an hemispheric turret. At 68 tons it was the heaviest of the serie. The driver was hydraulically assisted, and it had a brand new 1050-horsepower engine under his feets capable to bring this tank to 60 km/h. The armour was proof against 130mm rounds. Although very promising it was however never produced. The IS-8 and IS-9 only existed on paper.

The T-10 (1959)

1439 built. Last heavy tank to be developed from 1950, the IS-10 had a longer hull, a relatively conventional turret but a revised armour, a new 120 mm gun with fume extractor, and a new diesel engine. With the death of Stalin it was renamed T-10. At 52 tons, this tank was produced until 1966 but served also in the Six Day War, Yom Kippur War with Egyptian forces.

Mediums & MBTs: From the T-54 to the T-80

Two extremes of the entire MBT lineage of the Warsaw pact: The 1950s, 1st generation T-54, and at the opposite, the third generation T-80. The T-54/55 and T-62s were relatively cheap and low-tech, mass-produced tanks, which were gradually discredited on the middle eastern and 1991/2003 Iraqi theater. The T-64 was a breed apart, a brave attempt to create second generation MBT right into the 1960s, which ended with the creation on a way in between with the T-72.

This was the true successor to the ealier types, well modernized in between, but also a true second generation MBT. The T-80 was the successor of the high tech T-64 and was mixed with the T-72M to create the T-90 just when Soviet Union collapsed. At that time, although these models seemed closely related, lessons learned about the soviet quantity over quality dogma, the balance gradually and surely leaning toward the second…

T-54 (1949)

T-54
35,000 built. First medium tank of the cold war and a very famous one, it was still driven by the famous vision of “quantity has a quality in itself”. A simple and rugged the T-34 was this first MBT was developed through the T-44, and its entirely revised hull, but showcased a brand new hemispherical cast turret and 100 mm gun. When introduced in 1948 it was superior to anything in the west. Through modernization it is still in service worldwide and had an extraordinary active life.

T-55 (1955)

T-55
27,500 built. Basically a modernized T-54 fitted with NBC protection and revised engine this very similar tank was also declined into multiple versions and sold to a considerable number of armies worldwide, seeing a very extensive service until today, through modernizations and conversions.

T-62 (1961)

T-62
22,700 built. An attempt to upgrade the main armament with a brand new 115mm smoothbore cannon and autoloader, and a stretched-out hull. However the new design had several issues (poor accuracy, faulty automatic ejector) which prevented its large adoption on the international market.

T-64 (1964)

T-64
12,000 built. A brand new design and leap forward, this very advanced tank was long into service and remained an “elite” MBT that suffered numerous delays and teething problems after its introduction. It introduced a new sophisticated FCS, new suspensions, new ultra-compact engine, new D-81T 125 mm smoothbore gun with entirely revised autoloader. However it never really made it on the export market as the T-72 was chosen instead.

T-72 (1973)

T-72
25,000 built. If the T-62 and T-64 never made it to the export market, the T-72 did and replaced in practice the numerous T-54/55s in service worldwide. It was derived from the T-64 and other alternative designs but was much simplified for mass-production and imposed itself inside the Warsaw Pact, also spawning lots of derivatives or licence-built version. Still widely used worldwide. One of its versions was derived into the actual Russian MBT, the T-90.

T-80 (1976)

T-80
The T-80 was a successor to the T-64, using the same basis. Most notably, it was the first MBT produced in any numbers to be fitted with a gas turbine for propulsion. This 125 mm armed beast served in Chechnya, Ossetia and was heavily used by both sides in the War in Donbass.

Light tanks

PT-76
The PT-76 was the most common of the soviet light tank force, fully amphibious, it also formed the basis for many derivatives (APCs, command vehicles, SPAAGs, missiles launchers…). On the other hand, no less than four types of airborne vehicles were produced to match the requirement of paratroopers support on the field.

PT-76 (1952)


12,000 built. Amphibious tank. Designed in 1950 as a reconnaissance tank, it was light enough and had the right buoyancy to cross large rivers and lakes as well as assault by sea. Armed with the low-velocity 75mm gun and about 2000 were exported. At least a dozen known variants, including the PT-85 fitted with a cast turret and 85mm gun which inspired the Chinese type 63.

ASU-57 (1951)


500 built. A tankette tailored to be airdropped. Served only with the VDV (paratroopers corps), and armed with the Ch-51 57mm main gun. Retired and replaced by the ASU-85.

ASU-85 (1959)

(To come) The replacement for the ASU-57, still airborne SPG this time upgraded with an fully armoured roof and better 85mm high velocity gun capable to engage most Western Tanks. It was only used until the introduction of the BMD-1 which had the advantage to carry troops.

BMD-1 (1969)


3000 built. First airborne IFV designed as such. A good package helped by the size of the new generation Soviet carrier planes and combining a troop compartment, low velocity 73mm gun, two LMGs and two ATGMs (with more in stock) intended to deal with tanks (the gun was more designed to deal with infantry and light vehicles or obstacles).

BMD-2 (1985)

(To come) Replacement for the BMD-1 equipped with the 30 mm 2A42 multi-purpose autocannon, slightly larger according to the upgrade of Soviet carrier aircraft in capabilities. It was designed to replace the BMD-1 but failed to do so completely because of a production curtailed in 1991 with the Soviet economy collapse. It could be transported by the An-12, An-22, Il-76, An-124 and Mi-6, Mi-26 helicopters which like its predecessor, which gave it a fairly large array of tactical flexibility.

Infantry Fighting Vehicles


The BMP family literally from “Infantry Fighting vehicle”, is probably the most common type of IFVs ever to be found in the world, with a total of 50,000 vehicles, to compare with the 6,500 Bradley ever manufactured.

BMP-1 (1966)


20,000+ built. The most produced and famous IFV, largely exported, derived and produced under license. Could carry 3 crew plus 8 infantry, armed with a 73mm low velocity gun, ATGMs and KPVT light machine guns. However operations in Afghanistan and Chechnya showed its limitations in urban combat, low protection against mines and RPGs.

BMP-2 (1980)


20,000+ built. Production records are difficult to established due to an intense license production (Czechoslovakia, India, Bulgaria), exports and conversions. Revealed in 1978 but only entering service in 1980 it was relatively similar to the BMP-1 but armed with a 30mm autocannon instead and eliminated all the drawbacks of its predecessor.

BMP-3 (1987)


2000+ built. Developed in the Soviet era, it entered service just before the collapse of USSR. Therefore only a limited numbers were built, declined into 17 variants (Russia alone) and exported to 11 countries. The great novelty was the use of a 100mm gun/launcher 2A70 capable of delivering ATGMs (internal reload). It was coupled to a 30 mm autocannon 2A72 and three machine guns, quite a firepower for an augmented troop transport.

Armoured personal carriers


The BTR-40 was a 4×4 successor to the light wartime BA-64, and the BTR-152 was inspired by ww2 vehicles like the M3 half track. But the bulk of armoured troop transports was provided by the 8×8 Bronetransporters 60, 70 and 80, which were amphibious, NBC proven, with a better off-road motricity and also a cumulated 50,000 vehicles in all (real production figures are still ellusive). The smaller BRDMs were 4×4 well armed reconnaissance vehicles. The BMP-50 is the only tracked vehicle of the lot.

BTR-40 (1950)


8500 built. Postwar APC, designed as a replacement for the mass-produced 4×4 BA-64 reconnaissance vehicle which was already used often as an APC despite its small size. The BTR-40 was much larger and had many improvements but was still open-top an therefore had no NBC protection (bot for some specialized vehicles).

BTR-152 (1949)

15,000 built. First Soviet dedicated Postwar APC (before that soviet troops only knew “tank desant”), this 6×6 wheeled vehicle recalled American and German ww2 half-tracks. A simple all-wheeled configuration was preferred with a central tyre inflation system that allowed to deflate tyres (and therefore create more contact surface) on soft grounds. Open top and therefore not NBC protected but for specialized variant with hard-top.

BTR-50 (1952)


6,000 built. Tracked amphibious APC, although still not NBC protected. It was delivered to 20+ countries and declined into six main variants.

BTR-60 (1960)

BTR-60PB
25,000 built. The proverbial Soviet wheeled APC, declined into dozens of specialized variants and largely exported. It was NBC-protected (on later variants) and amphibious. However its compartimentation with central escape hatches (rather than a rear door) made it difficult for the troops to operate in safety.

BTR-70 (1972)

BTR-70
5000 built. Less common but still well exported, this vehicle was given a heavier armament and more powerful engine. At least 30 known variants, Soviet or local, like the Romanian TAB-77.

BTR-80 (1986)

BTR-80
5000 built. Last soviet evolution of the type, with several modifications but the same armament, later declined into the BTR-80 and BTR-82 IFVs. It is the base for several Ukrainian sub-variants.

BRDM-1 (1957)


10,000 built. Amphibious reconnaissance vehicle. Also declined as a tank-hunter and many other variants. Well exported, mostly in Africa (about 50 countries).

BRDM-2 (1962)

(To come) Modernized version, with a heavier armament and many more versions despite a lower production.

2S1
The 2S1 Gvozdika (1970) was the most current Soviet self propelled artillery during the cold war, a vehicle equipped with a 122 mm gun howitzer in turret, very low compared to its Western equivalents. It was delivered in the tens of thousands until 1991 to fill the organic rôle of mobile artillery into each motorized rifle division or Tank division (72 or 36 respectively per unit), and was largely exported and also produced under licence by Poland, Romania, Iran, and Bulgaria.

Soviet cold war related links

Soviet armour (generic) on Wikipedia

30 Responses to USSR

  1. Kevin Cz says:

    I hope to see a individual page section done for the T10/T10m

    In my opinion it is a underrated tank of its time, yes it was meant to be a successor to the IS heavy tank series , and as such is arguably the last generation soviet heavy tank, however it was an extremely mobile tank for its size, it was proably comparable to the T55 in mobility.

    so its a heavy tank that is good for offensives and happens to have some similarities to MBT class tanks of the time period.

    which is why i think it would be interesting to see a dedicated page done or the T10/T10m tank. its proably the most unique tank of the time period.

    because of this I would go as far as argue t10 was the soviet unions best tank until the development of the t64.

    • TEadmin says:

      Hi Kevin,
      There will be. It was serial-produced and it’s enough to secure its own post.
      Other Soviet heavy tanks have one also as prototypes.

      Cheers,

  2. Oswald says:

    the link to the T80 is missing I hope you could end the page or fix the link “tanks”

    • TEadmin says:

      Currently we are working on the T80. So don’t worry it will be published soon (as well as the Ukrainian T84).
      All the best and stay tune !

  3. Tyr says:

    Tbank you for your awesome website!And I really wish to see the pages of T-80,BMP-3,T-10 and ZSU-23!

  4. RRR says:

    I never knew there were so many BTRs,

  5. HeroOfDover says:

    Try and get in contact with some 3D developers to try and make a 3d model for the ‘customers’ of this website to swivel around and look at all the out side components

    Also try and get pictures of the interior for these wonderful tanks.

    • Stan Lucian says:

      HeroofDover,
      We’re doing this in our own private time, with no pay or other rewards. It is hobby and we are doing as much as humanly possible.
      All the best,
      Luke

  6. Tanker says:

    When is the IS-6 or IS-7 ready TEAdmin

  7. Brad Golding says:

    Dear Moderators and Admin!
    What else can I say, I love this site! I am a former Centurion Commander and Troop Seargent (Australian Army) and I love Tanks!!!
    Keep up the great work guys, and thank you!
    Brad

  8. James says:

    the Korea war has been going on since 1950, but the conflict ended in 1953 not 1954.

  9. Isaac says:

    Can anyone help with these tanks/APC? What are these? Tanks in advance
    https://postimg.org/image/p6weqce25/
    https://postimg.org/image/fmvursj0j/

  10. Kris says:

    unless i have failed to find it, you should make an article on the zsu 23-4 shilka. nice website by the way, really informative.

  11. Just a guy who likes history says:

    Hey do y’all have plans to do object 906?

  12. CW says:

    T-62: “An attempt to upgrade the main armament with a brand new 115mm smoothbore cannon and ***autoloader***, and a stretched-out hull.”

    I’m sorry, what?

  13. HISTORY! says:

    I got a Question. are you going to add the IS-7 and IS-6.

  14. Alexsandr says:

    Dear moderator, let me add to the signature of the T-80 tank drawing. Indeed, this tank is based on the armies of Ukraine and the Russian Federation. But participation in battles, if he took, it is only in the Ukrainian formations (there is practically no data). From Russia militiamen, he was not supplied and on their side in the fighting was not. Please, be more objective!

  15. Alexsandr says:

    Let me add to the signature of the T-10 tank drawing. This tank, with the exception of events in Czechoslovakia, took part in hostilities never.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *