Hello dear reader! This article is in a constant state of update, given that it is a contemporary tank. Last updated 26/11/2017.

Syria (2017)
Armor Testbed – 2 – 4 converted

New armor kits for the SAA?

The T-72 Shafrah (meaning “Sharp Blade” or “Razor”, a name suggested by WithinSyria blog, a joke based on its shaving razor-like appearance) is a testbed for a new type of armor intended for a centralized SAA (Syrian Arab Army) T-72 upgrade intended to resist all forms of anti-tank rockets. Syrian tanks have, thus far, been highly vulnerable to Anti-Tank Guided Missiles (ATGMs), and successful missile attacks against SAA tanks in Damascus are often filmed and used for enemy propaganda. Thus it is very understandable why the SAA wanted to develop rocket resistant tank armor packages.

The Shafrah package does not appear to have been this answer – even despite a ‘better’ relative performance compared to the SAA 4th Armored Division’s T-72 Mahmia.

There are at least two known T-72 Shafrah tanks, but there may be more (as analyzing footage and photographs to tell vehicles apart is very difficult). One, which is quite easy to distinguish, has ERA on the turret, as the base vehicle is a T-72AV. However, the most commonly filmed T-72 Shafrah is the non-AV version.

A second T-72AV Shafrah may exist (referred to as T-72AV Shafrah II from hereon), as one was photographed at Deir ez-Zor in mid-November, 2017. It is unlikely to be the original T-72AV Shafrah, as this one was knocked out at Qaboun and burned by rebels. Unlike the first T-72AV Shafrah, this one has sideskirts on, and has more extensive turret plating.

Other vehicles also have Shafrah armor. At least two or three bulldozers had the upgrade as early as October 2016 (see sidenote II), and at least one ZSU-23-4 Shilka was seen circa late March 2017 (see sidenote I).

T-72AV Shafrah closeup, with its side skirts and original turret layout
T-72 Shafrah closeup. On the lefthand side of the gun is one distinct large plate. The hull also clearly has rows of angled plates. Posted 27th February 2017.

Context: T-72 Grendizer Project

Major tank upgrades in Syria mostly concern making tanks resistant to rockets and missiles. Whilst the T-72 Mahmia (also known as the T-72 Adra) upgrade of the SAA 4th Armored Division was successful at defeating RPG-29 hits, it was not consistent at defeating ATGMs. In recent months, it seems as though tank upgrades have been centralized by the Syrian Arab Army, with the intention of making a new type of upgraded T-72 that is invulnerable to all missile types.

This mysterious upgraded T-72 project has been dubbed “T-72 Grendizer”, which refers to a popular Japanese cartoon show that was popular in the Middle East in the 1980s – children of that era now being the tank crews of today. The existence of the T-72 Grendizer project is based off a tweet from @syrianmilitary, and therefore, the existence of this project is not confirmed (the T-72 Shafrah may even be the T-72 Grendizer). Assuming the project to be real, then unlike the T-72 Mahmia, the T-72 Grendizer appears to be a centralized project headed by the Syrian Arab Army as opposed to just the 4th Armored Division.

However, the T-72 Grendizer is not yet a finalized design – it is merely a concept. There are only a few things that are known. Firstly, it will be a T-72, and secondly, it will have armor intended to resist all enemy missile types. It is totally unclear how far along the T-72 Grendizer project is, but it can be assumed that the armor it will use has not been settled on yet.

The T-72 Shafrah, appears to be a testbed made in very short series by the SAA Republican Guard’s 105th Mechanized Brigade for a relatively new type of armor (first seen used on bulldozers in October 2016) in order to see if it is acceptable for the T-72 Grendizer project.

Design of the armor

WithinSyria blog reports that the armor plates are made of RHA (1.5 mm – 2 mm thick), tungsten, and glassfiber. It is rumored that the tungsten part refers to 1 mm thick tungsten copper plates. However, with an alleged budget of $5,000-10,000 US per month, the Republican Guard is unlikely to be able to use tungsten on a wider scale than this testbed due to the material being too costly. This armor package, therefore, seems as though it is designed to be a form of composite armor which, like the T-55 Enigma, should be able to stop ATGMs.

However, the reader should note that the armor’s exact composition is not proven. It is equally valid to believe that the plates are made purely from steel.

Armor layout of the T-72 Shafrah

The T-72 Shafrah is more commonly seen than the AV variant. This one is seen at all times with its sideskirts until May, 2017, by which time they were removed. The turret is encased in multiple brackets which have two large armor plates. The left-hand side of the turret only has a single plate, but is as tall as the rest of the plates. The sideskirts are made of five plates angled slightly.

Armor layout of the T-72AV Shafrah

The base vehicle of the T-72AV Shafrah is a T-72AV with only its turret Explosive Reactive Armor (ERA) retained, and Viper-72 thermal imaging systems (see Sidenote III below).

The vehicle’s turret had one small half plate on the left-hand side of the gun in order to allow the Laser Range Finder to be unobstructed. The rest of the turret was encased in seven brackets (which is apparently more than the T-72 Shafrah had), with multiple small armor layers (as opposed to just two large ones, which the T-72 Shafrah had).

At some point, the vehicle had sideskirts, as evidenced by bars between the roadwheels, but it appears as though they were lost very early on into the battle at Qaboun, March 22nd, 2017.

T-72AV Shafrah viewed from the front.
T-72AV Shafrah viewed from the front. There are many welded plates, creating a composite armor system. The source reports that the vehicle is in service with the 105th Mechanized Brigade of the Republican Guard. It is also equipped with Viper-72 sights (see Sidenote III).


T-72 Shafrah at Eastern Ghouta, 27th February 2017

The T-72 Shafrah was first documented in combat in Eastern Ghouta, on 27th February 2017. The footage below shows that the vehicle was hit by an ATGM. As a result, the driver was wounded and the turret was damaged, but the vehicle was not destroyed. Crucially, there was no internal fire, which was a common problem with the T-72 Mahmia. However, at this point, the Republican Guard stated that the T-72 Shafrah was not considered good enough for their purposes, and it may be the case that the official testing phase ended at this point.

It was later photographed being transported back to the workshop on the back of a lorry. The photograph was dated 1st March 2017.

T-72 Shafrah being hit by an ATGM. The footage is cropped, and the vehicle was not destroyed.

T-72 and T-72AV Shafrah at Qaboun, 22nd March 2017

The T-72 Shafrah tank was next seen in combat along with the T-72AV Shafrah (videos show it already missing its sideskirt), and a third, lightly modified T-72 on 22nd March 2017 at Qaboun, in the north of Jobar, in east Damascus. The fighting took place near a fabric factory. The source (a tweet with two videos) suggests that 150 rebels were killed in the assault, which was supported by infantry.

The T-72 Shafrah in combat at Qaboun, Jobar, Eastern Damascus, March 22nd, 2017.

More combat of the T-72AV Shafrah, Qaboun, Jobar, Eastern Damascus, March 22nd, 2017.

T-72AV Shafrah destroyed at Qaboun, 16th April 2017

On the 16th April 2017, a photo was posted online showing what appears to be the T-72AV Shafrah having been knocked out at Qaboum. The photo shows the vehicle’s turret on fire, with multiple armor brackets missing. Reports suggest that it was hit by an AT mine which destroyed a track, but caused no damage. The crew escaped, but several soldiers are reported to have been killed or wounded in the attack.

A T-72 Mahmia was alongside the T-72AV Shafrah during the attack. The T-72 Mahmia took an RPG-29 hit, which did not penetrate the tank. However, the commander sustained significant injuries.

The vehicle was finally set on fire by the rebels, to stop any chance of recovery, and it is now probably wrecked beyond repair. Ahrah al-Sham have claimed responsibility for the vehicle’s destruction.

The T-72AV Shafrah, destroyed by rebels at Qaboun, 16th April 2017.

T-72 Shafrah fights on in the Qaboun Offensive, May, 2017

In an offensive that lasted from 18th February to 29th May, the T-72 Shafrah was photographed fighting again on the 6th and 8th May, and had likely been fighting throughout the offensive from mid-March (and with the T-72AV Shafrah until its destruction on April 16th).

On May 7th, an agreement between rebel forces and Government forces led to the eventual evacuation of rebels from the district. Evacuations took place until 13th May, by which time the government had captured all of Qaboun. A new evacuation deal led to further rebels and their families leaving the district, and by May 15th, the government had total control over the district.

T-72 Shafrah at Qaboun, 6th May, 2017. The sideskirts have now been removed.

T-72 Shafrah at Qaboun, 6th May, 2017.

A different view of the above.

T-72 Shafrah at Qaboun, May 8th, 2017.

T-72 Shafrah at Jobar, June 2017

The T-72 Shafrah has been photographed in late June fighting in Jobar along with a ZSU-23-4 Shafrah, and at least one other regular T-72. Reports indicate that the 105th Republican Guards are attacking Ein Tarma (near Jobar) from the southwest and made some gains.

T-72 Shafrah, Jobar, 21st June, 2017. This may be evidence of a second T-72 Shafrah as the turret brackets have significantly more plating than in above photos. However, it is quite probable that this was an upgrade to the original T-72 Shafrah, as the Republican Guard realized a need to improve the armor of the project, following T-72AV Shafrah’s destruction in April.

ZSU-23-4 Shafrah at Jobar, 21st June, 2017.

Another T-72AV Shafrah?

On 19th November 2017, four photos were posted online of a T-72AV with Shafrah armor crossing a bridge over the River Euphrates via Hawijat Kati island at Deir ez-Zor. It is unclear yet if this is another T-72AV Shafrah, or if the one knocked out at Qaboun has been repaired. The latter is unlikely because it was set alight after being knocked out, meaning the tank probably needed capital repairs. It is, therefore, more likely that this is a second T-72AV Shafrah.

The armor layout of this vehicle is different to the original T-72AV Shafrah. Firstly, it has sideskirts (one side is missing a third of the skirt closest to the front of the vehicle, and the other side is missing a third of the skirt closest to the rear). Secondly, the turret has substantially more plating brackets (and plating on the brackets). This last detail indicates that the Republican Guard have understood from previous experience that they need to place as much armor as possible on the tank to avoid damage.

T-72AV Shafrah II behind a T-72AV near a bridge crossing at Deir ez-Zor (circa 16th November 2017). The rear third of the skirt (on the left) is actually missing from the tank. Notice also that the turret also has more brackets, and each bracket has more armor plates compared to earlier Shafrah-upgraded T-72s. This is likely in response to earlier models being too poorly armored.

Different view of the above, showing the other skirt to be missing its front third.

Different view of the above.

Different view of the above, showing the rear of the tank to also be significantly uparmored. The SAA crossed the River Euphrates via Hawijat Kati Island.

Last Reported Position

The T-72AV Shafrah’s status is currently unknown. It may have been recovered, as Qaboun has now been cleared out. However, it may have been destroyed beyond repair and has therefore been left where it was destroyed. It is also possible (but not likely) that it was repaired (See T-72AV Shafrah II).

The T-72 Shafrah was last photographed ‘at Jobar’ on 28th July, 2017.

The T-72AV Shafrah II was last seen crossing a bridge into Deir ez-Zor around late November 2017.


‘Better’ than the T-72 Mahmia?

It seems as though the T-72 Shafrah is somewhat more successful at defeating ATGMs than the earlier T-72 Mahmia. When the vehicle was hit by an ATGM on 27th February, it did not succumb to an internal fire, which was a common problem with the T-72 Mahmia. However, it still sustained significant turret damage, and a crew member was wounded. Put simply, this is not good enough for the SAA’s needs, and the Republican Guard, at that point, knew this to be the case. It must be noted, however, the concept seems much more sound than the Mahmia upgrade package.

All in all, it can be concluded that the Shafrah armor package is marginally better than the Mahmia armor package. One caveat to these conclusions is that there is very limited data on the performance of Shafrah armor.

Another caveat is that the tank still suffers from other issues that cannot be resolved by an armor package. The AT mine that immobilized the T-72AV Shafrah meant that it had to be abandoned. No armor could have saved the vehicle from this.

Implications for the T-72 Grendizer

Again, assuming the T-72 Grendizer to be real, whether or not this armor type will be seen on it is another matter. The hit from an ATGM on 27th February shows that the vehicle is still not impervious to ATGM hits, which is what the SAA is looking for; thus one of two situations will play out:

It is most likely to be the case that further experiments take place with new armor package types.

On the other hand, with such a limited budget, it may be that the Republican Guard, and, indeed, the 4th Armored Division, have reached their technological limit and will have to settle for the Shafrah or perhaps even the cheaper Mahmia upgrades. They may therefore have to abandon the Grendizer project. A more complex armor system is a necessity if the SAA wants to defeat ATGMs – this can be achieved by an Active Protection System (which is far beyond their budget), or a more complex armor system, such as the composite armor system on the T-55 Enigma.

The SAA has more T-72s earmarked for upgrades, but it is unclear how they will be upgraded. The intention is for them to be upgraded to the still unfinished T-72 Grendizer standard – a design which is still being figured out.

T-72AV of the Republican Guard, for comparison.

T-72 Mahmia, for comparison.

T-72AV Shafrah with its post-trial armor layout at Qaboun, 24th March, 2017.

T-72 Shafrah. Posted online, 1st April, 2017.

T-72AV Shafrah being transported by lorry back to the workshop, photo posted online on 1st March
T-72 Shafrah being transported by lorry back to the workshop, photo posted online on 1st March 2017. This was after the vehicle had been hit by an ATGM.

The T-72AV Shafrah with the new armor layout on 25th March 2017. Bars originally holding on the sideskirts can be seen just in front of the first wheel and between the second and third from the front.
The T-72AV Shafrah on 25th March 2017. Bars originally holding on the sideskirts can be seen just in front of the first wheel and between the second and third from the front. Rows of angled armor plates can also be seen on the hull.

T-72AV Shafrah in combat at Qaboun, supported by infantry, on 24th March 2017
T-72AV Shafrah in combat at Qaboun, supported by infantry, reportedly on 24th March 2017. The turret layout appears slightly different to the above, but it is probably an optical illusion.

Footage of the T-72AV Shafrah, knocked out at Qaboun, 16th April, 2017.

T-72AV Shafrah and a T-72AV with their crews. Unknown date.

This photo is reported to show T-72 Shafrah at Ein Tarma, Qaboun, 21st June, 2017. However, it is obvious that this is T-72AV Shafrah, likely at a much earlier date in Qaboun, because the AV model was destroyed on 16th April. This photograph may have been taken by a rebel shortly before the vehicle was knocked out.

T-72 Shafrah, reportedly at Jobar, 28th July, 2017.

An SAA propaganda social media picture, showing the T-72 Shafrah. This image reveals that the rear of the vehicle was marginally uparmored, too.

Sidenote I: ZSU-23-4 Shafrah

On March 26th, a photo of a ZSU-23-4 converted with “Shafrah armor” has surfaced. This, too, is a testbed, used by the Republican Guards, probably the 105th Mechanized Brigade. Further details are not clear, due to the vehicle’s recent appearance. Further information will be added when available. ZSU-23-4s are actually used for supporting vehicles in urban combat, as their guns can hit enemy positions which are high up in tall buildings.

“ZSU-23-4 Shafrah”, in Jobar, posted online on March 27th, 2017. The photo was probably taken on 26th March, 2017. The vehicle may have been built up to a week earlier, however, it seems odd that it has not been seen in combat earlier, if that is the case. Footage can be viewed here.

ZSU-23-4 Shafrah, March, 2017.

Sidenote II: Bulldozers with Shafrah armor

The Shafrah armor package originally appears to have been given to bulldozers, around October 2016. One was reportedly captured by Jaish al-Islam in October 2016. Another bulldozer with Shafrah armor was also used by the 105th Brigade at the Siege of Wadi Barada, January 2017.

Bulldozer with Shafrah armor, captured by Jaish al-Islam in eastern Ghouta, October 2016.

Other view of the bulldozer with Shafrah armor, captured by Jaish al-Islam in eastern Ghouta, October 2016.

A bulldozer with Shafrah armor of the 105th Brigade at Wadi Barada, January, 2017.

Another bulldozer, probably a third was seen on 30th March 2017, probably at Qaboun with the 105th Mechanized Brigade.

A Republican Guard bulldozer with Shafrah armor. Posted online on 30th March, 2017.

Sidenote III: Viper-72 thermal sights

The T-72AV Shafrah is fitted with Viper-72 thermal imaging sights. This is quite an important feature. Since the beginning of the Syrian Civil War, tanks, especially those with complex technologies, have fallen into disrepair. This means that regular night vision sights and infra-red lamps are no longer functioning, and tanks cannot engage in night time combat.

As a way around this, the SAA has fitted some of their tanks with Viper-72 thermal imaging sights, which do not require any infra-red lights. This is quite ingenious, as it allows not only effective aiming from 1.5 km – 2km (0.9-1.2 miles), but also the ability for the tank crew to see enemy snipers behind cover.


The author would like to extend his thanks to @Mathieumorant
Within Syria blog / Twitter

T-72 Mahmia
Share →

2 Responses to T-72 Shafrah

  1. Chiyomi says:

    This armor, it’s so strange and odd looking. Was this armor designed for bouncing shells and machine gun bullets? Also the photo with it being carried by the lorry, the T-72AV looks strangely like a M1A4 Abrams. But is this armor just made for spaced armor?

    • Willkerrs says:

      T-72s are already impervious to small arms fire such as machine guns. They have already been able to make armour packages that are resistant to RPGs (See T-72 Mahmia, aka T-72 Adra). As for shells (from other tanks, field guns, etc), that’s actually a good question. The Syrian Arab Army’s upgraded tanks (and i’m talking about armour packages; not cages which are more likely for ammo and equipment storage) only fight in Damascus, a heavily urbanised area. As a result, the rebels can’t really field any type of guns (the rebels in Damascus also don’t have tanks, to my knowledge), so resisting enemy shells is a non-issue.

      As I said in the article, the armour is specifically designed for defeating ATGMs (Anti-Tank Guided Missiles). Again, Damascus is heavily urbanised, so that means rebels with rockets can fire on SAA tanks from practically anywhere. Also consider that the T-72 cannot elevate its gun to hit every building, so the rebels have a strong advantage. However, the SAA are using ZSU-23-4 SPAAGs (which have a much better gun elevation) to hit rebels in high buildings, even then the tank is up close to the building. As a result, we’ve seen a handful of ZSU-23-4s with Mahmia armour and at least one with Shafrah armour.

      As I said in the article, the armour is not spaced, it is technically a composite armour. Even the T-72 Mahmia (aka Adra) is partly composite armour (the exact make up of which we’re not sure, but we’re told it’s cheap, basic, but highly effective).

      As for the tank looking like the Abrams – it’s only really from that side. The original left-hand side turret armour plating was just a single plate. The other side was made up of more pieces – see here: http://www.tanks-encyclopedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/C8WV7WRW0AAh__H.jpg

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *