Austro-Hungarian armored cars and tanks


The German-speaking Austro-Hungarian Empire entered the war as a natural ally of the Central Powers. But, contrary to the German Empire, it was an uneasy bicephalic kingdom ruling over a dozen of minorities with vastly different cultures and languages. Political tensions were high and the memory of the Balkan war was still fresh.

The spark

In the Balkans in particular, nationalistic undergound movements triggered bombings and a famous assassination. The Archduke Franz-Ferdinand was murdered by young Serb activist and anarchist Gavrilo Prinzip, operating for the Mlada Bosna, supported by the larger “black hand” movement in Sarajevo. The Archduke was, on 28 June 1914, visiting the city in an open coach, passing by narrow streets with a distracted protection, and was already attacked by a group of 6 nationalists including Prinzip. A grenade was launched but missed, but the Archduke resumed his visit to the hospital, while the group scattered.

Later on, Prinzip, alone, found the convoy one more time and drew his pistol. The Archduke was shot at very close range and fatally wounded. He died the same day. Prinzip was immediately arrested and thrown in jail pending trial. Soon after, anti-Serbian riots erupted, largely organized by Muslim-origin Schutzkorps militias. Actions also erupted against Serbs in Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

The alliance mechanics

As everybody knows, that was the spark that would consume all Europe and beyond for four years. By the simple mechanics of alliances, the Central Powers and the Entente joined in and, during that fatal summer (July-August 1914), mobilization was declared everywhere and grand plans of offense or defense were rapidly re-opened.

Austro-Hungary did its fair share of conscription too, although some minorities tried to avoid it. Operations were directed at first again Serbia, when the ultimatum expired, and were followed by military operations. Russia was allied to Serbia and rapidly prepared to intervene, although mobilization was slow (partly due to the lack of railroads and its huge territory). Germany then reacted, conforming to its alliance with Austro-Hungary and soon France (because of its alliance with Russia), weary of revenge and motivated to retake the bordering Aslace-Lorraine region, joined the war, preparing to face Germany, its hated arch-enemy since 1870. The Prussian military head of staff knew full well that Russia needed time to mobilize and choose to strike first in France, using a carefully planned attack, years in the making on maps (Prussian officers considered warfare as a science), the so-called “Schlieffen plan”.

At the same time, the British Empire could have opted out of what was largely seen as a continental struggle, after all, protected by the channel and the most powerful fleet in the world. But, at the same time, relations eased with arch-enemy France, especially since the joint operation in Crimea in 1853-56, and despite an incident in Fachoda on Colonial matters, a “concorde” existed between the two countries. Beyond that, if France had failed and the German militarist regime would have spread on all the continent, the official policy of maintaining balance between the great powers would have been shattered and the Empire would have faced, alone, a continental superpower. So, all these major powers were thrown into the conflict that raged more than 100 years ago, and dragged their colonial empires and resources with them.

The Austro-Hungarian Empire at war

So, as we ween above, the Empire found itself the first at war among European nations, against Serbia. The contest was, on paper, won in advance. Indeed, the Serbian army was ill-equipped and largely outnumbered, but stood its ground and concentrated artillery correctly, inflicting crippling casualties on the Hungarians at the Battle of Cer and the Battle of Kolubara on 12 August and after. After that, a sizeable fraction of the Army was stationed on the borders, preventing these forces from joining with the ones already protecting against Russia or Italy (which, although part of the Central Powers, remained neutral until 1915).

The Army and early operations

Compared to the well-oiled Prussian military machine, the Austro-Hungarian army was seen as less modern, lacking artillery, modern transportation, with a rigid organization and notoriously finicky and inefficient administration, and with officers still relying on largely obsolete 1860s-1870s tactics. Austro-Hungarian troops, despite their diversity, fought relatively well, but more so in defense rather than offense.

Against Russia

Russia was found mostly preoccupied with Germany at first, which was nearer to Poland and the roads to Moscow, and was unable to launch sizable attacks or to pierce through the Austro-Hungarian defenses.

Against Italy

The same situation was repeated on one of the most difficult terrain of the war, high in the frozen peaks and treacherous valleys of the Alpine frontier against Italy. This “mountain war” was largely a stalemate, the Italians being constantly on the offensive, but without much success. Because of the terrain on this particular theater of operation, neither side saw any advantage in using armored cars or tanks, but both had plans for these towards the end of the war.


The Austro-Hungarian army was found at least partly on the offensive, well supplied with German hardware, under Svetozar Boroević, and with the help of German troops commanded by Otto von Below, during the final phases of the Battles of the Isonzo (late 1917). The town of Kobarid (in moden Slovenia, better known as Caporetto) was taken, re-taken, lost and re-taken again by both sides and eventually leveled and considered, at the time of the offensive, a quiet sector. The German military though it was perfect terrain for launching a massive gas attack on 24 October. Indeed, German troops spearheaded the attack, using storm troopers for infiltration in the Mount Matajur and the Kolovrat Range, with close artillery support, advancing 25 km in enemy territory and seizing strong points and key positions.

Other sectors of the Italian line had to send reinforcement, weakening the whole defensive line in the process, while the Central Powers offensive resumed. At the end, fearing being cut off, some units retreated, or tried a defensive retreat ordered by Marshal Luigi Cadorna and this gradually transformed, with an all-out attack on the whole line and artillery pounding, into a fullblown a rout. This was a catastrophy for the Italians, who lost some 40,000 men wounded or killed, whereas 265,000 were captured and 300,000 missing, drifters or deserters. Later on, retreating forces held of the enemy offensive for some time during the Battle of the Piave River. Following Caporetto, Cadorna, who was quite harsh and hated by the troops, was sacked and replaced by Armando Diaz and Pietro Badoglio. Italy then took defensive positions until the end of the war.


An engineer born in Austro-Hungary, Günther Burstyn, designed a very strange tank early on, in 1911, which was tailored to cross trenches of all sizes. This was the Burstyn Motorgeschütz. It was relatively small, with a fully revolving turret armed with a light 47 mm (1.85 in) Skoda gun, and a crew of two. The great advantage of this experimental design were the articulated arms linked to the rear and front axles that could swing freely on the terrain, using massive coils. Basically, these arms were raised when crossing bad terrain to avoid being stuck in obstacles, and lowered on the ground to allow trench crossing. The choice of this kind of solution offered the possibility to use a smaller vehicle, yet with a more powerful power-to-weight ratio, which was vital for mobility in general.

It was an excellent compromise, and showed features (except the articulated arms) that would be commonplace with tanks like the FT at the end of the war and to this day, and therefore would probably merit to be considered a landmark in tank history. Needless to say, the officers and general staff were not impressed and blocked any further production.

Tanks Encyclopedia rendition of the type.

Armoured cars

Austro-Daimler Panzerwagen (1904)
Also a possible landmark in armored vehicle history, this was the first modern armored car. It predated, by a year, the Russo-French Charron (produced in a small series), and had an entirely armored body, carefully modeled, with a hemispheric turret at the rear. It was armed with one or two machine-guns. The driver and co-driver/commander positions could be raised to see above the roof. It is still unclear if only one or two such vehicles were built, but the Army was not impressed and no production order ever came.

Junovicz P.A.1 (1915)
The only armored car really built in a “series” (just a few in fact), this vehicle was improvized by the officer with the same name. It had six machine-gun ports and was relativey heavy. A single armored car unit, the K.u.K. Panzerautozug No.1 was mobilized at the end of the war with two Junovicz, one Romfell, one captured Lancia IZ and one ex-Russian Austin on the Italian Front.

Romfell P.A.2
This last WWI Austro-Hungarian model had only a single vehicle built, but it became operational anyway.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *